PBS Newshour

As a musician who’s played in a lot of bands (from pit to opera) that guy is ON TO SOMETHING! WELL DONE!

Arts organisations are constantly coming up with 2 unsustainable solutions:
a) programs that only appeal to older people

b) Usually abominable ‘crossover’ programs (rock band meets symphony!) or endless variations on ‘pops’ concerts.

c) Re-purpose an existing pop-culture piece as serious art (I’m thinking of the now defunct opera company in NYC that did an opera about ‘Anna Nicole Smith’.

To look ‘cool’ they may offer grants for writing lots of opera, music, dance, but rarely offer performances of those works. (Which makes no sense.)

Said it before, say it again: the Europeans have the right model: go SMALL. Instead of doing 4 HUGE operas every year, do 20 small ones at 1/10th the budget. The core audience will always be there… and they want new works. Composers? They’ve given up trying because they never get a chance to get played. If you offer them venues, they’ll step up, just like composers in every era do. The reason so much music STINKS today is because there hasn’t been enough competition. Going small would fix that.

In short, stop trying to squeeze the maximum $ from a rapidly diminishing audience of 70 year old Puccini lovers. It’s simply unsustainable.

NPR Interview with Joni Mitchell December 8, 2014

A good interview with Joni Mitchell, where she mentions the big shift in vocal timbre she underwent after her initial success. She refers to the voice of her youth as her ‘helium voice’.

I always think of Sarah Vaughan when I think of Joni Mitchell; two singers who became famous at a very young age singing totally outside of what any voice teacher would call their comfortable range. In addition to becoming icons in their respective genres, they both lost most of their popularity as they matured.

Critics like to describe their loss of popularity by saying that they became more ‘artistic’, ie. singing more to a core audience and less for ‘the masses’. But like most things, the simplest explanation is that most people, even their fans, much preferred the ‘unnatural’ voices of their youth.

I’ve tried to be open-minded, in Sarah’s case because she was so beloved by hard core jazz fans and in Joni’s case because I admire her songwriting. But the truth? I -liked- Joni’s helium voice. Joni’s ‘real’ voice–the one that comes to her naturally–regardless of the songwriting, just leaves me cold. So when she started shifting to more adventurous songwriting, it was doubly challenging for even her core fans. She wanted people to like quite radical shifts in songwriting without giving them the lifeline of that unique vocal timbre.

I mention all this because it begs the question: would Joni have been better off singing more like ‘herself’ as a kid? If she had run into a vocal coach who steered her towards ‘the correct voice’, would we still have that Big Yellow Taxi? To what degree is there a ‘right’ way to do things?

And then there is this old condundrum: if we stumble on something to which people respond, how much weight should we give to that in managing our affairs? After all, like so many others, Joni Mitchell -could- have decided to stick with her ‘helium voice’ because people enjoyed it so much. Don’t most of us end up doing things because of the approval of others?

Joni Mitchell has had a career that few people could equal and in effect she’s had the chance to have her cake and eat it too. But I wonder if there isn’t the slightest bit of a nostalgia for her in listening back to her early stuff and that ‘helium voice’. After all, that’s the voice that got her where she is now. It’s like the woman of a certain age, railing against the shallowness of men and their attraction to younger women. And every so often still checking the mirror.

Having run into a badger once, this strikes me about as safe as giving yer kid a shotgun to play with. And yet so much stuff that I think is perfectly OK for kids, younger parents would probably think of with equal horror.

For example… When I was a lad, I had a chemistry set to die for. Nowadays, you probably would get a call from the feds just for owning some of that kit. 😀

Tonight I’m lonely and I miss Joe Pass. And I miss Joe Pass not just because he was the greatest jazz guitar player that ever lived. And not just because, of the hundreds of ‘guitar’ albums I own because I play guitar, his are among the very few I actually listen to.

I’ve read a couple of articles on this ‘whorl shark’ and paleontologists insist it’s for real. But one sees so many ‘photoshopped’ piccies these days I automatically assumed it was a joke. And I still think so.

‘Common sense’ (whatever that is) tells me that this is a fabulous case of wrong interpretation. It seems to me that Mother Nature doesn’t do stuff like this unless there’s a pretty good reason and I’m having a very tough time understanding how the proposed appendage in any way helps the fish obtain or process food.

If anyone has any (educated) idea as to how one gets from the fossil to this rendering I would be interested to hear about it.